ART | SCI LECTURES
CAA /
LEONARDO
SESSIONS
ARCO
‘06
ARTE CONTEMPORANEO
RELATED
EVENTS
 
|
CAA
/ LEONARDO SESSIONS
Panel 2007
-> Panel 2006
Proposal for LEF Affiliated Sponsored Session at CAA
/ NYC 2007
Ecology and Ethics of Art|Science projects
Panel Chair: Victoria Vesna
Abstract
The history of artists and scientists collaborating is already running
into decades and as the gap between two cultures closes, new problems
of the emerging hybridity emerge. In the time when artists are exploring
and even getting directly involved in biotech, nanotech and space exploration
labs to name a few, it is critical to address issues of methodology, ethics
and ecology of this new form of creative collaboration and research. For
a variety of reasons, the context that the scientist works in prevents
difficult questions being asked which puts the artist in a precarious
position that requires a lot of insight and care in how to approach uneasy
issues raised. Yet there is no question that it is important not to be
put in a situation where self-censorship takes place in order to continue
having access to the research and technology necessary to engage the work
in compelling and meaningful ways. The scientist, on the other hand, has
to be careful not to get involved in overtly critical projects that could
endanger the funding and survival of their lab and research. And yet,
many
scientists recognize the need to address some of the problematic aspects
of the work they are involved in and find working with an artist a good
venue for helping put out messages that are informed by facts. The question
then is how to move along this razor's path and work in ways that remain
original while making powerful statements to the public without becoming
didactic.
This panel will address these issues through examples of situations that
artists and scientists found themselves in when attempting to collaborate
and create new forms of expression by fusing the two worlds. Proposals
from artist and scientist teams are preferred.
The format consists of a 10 minute presentation by each
team, followed by a moderated discussion.
|
|